States & Communities Lashing Out at Water Fluoridation

Secure Arkansas believes that it’s high time to reveal more history
and corruption behind the industrial toxic waste called fluoride
that is being dumped into our drinking water supply
and is poisoning people all across the country.

image credit

• Our own state of Arkansas is working to rid our population of this dangerous chemical: see our previous article, which mentions legislation to repeal the fluoride mandate.

• Utah is working to end water fluoridation.

• Portland, Oregon has refused water fluoridation time and time again.

• Kentucky legislators have introduced bills to end water fluoridation mandates.

• Approximately 20 communities have halted water fluoridation since the federal ruling about the toxicity of fluoride came out in September of this year. These include Winter Haven, Florida; Clearfield, Pennsylvania; and Tomahawk, Wisconsin.

• Sixty other communities are voting and discussing the harmful effects of water fluoridation and what to do about this problem.

Other states need the opportunity to hear this important information as well, so they can help Make America Healthy Again.

As reported in the Wall Street Journal, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has denounced fluoride as an industrial waste associated with arthritis, bone fractures, bone cancer, IQ loss, neuro-developmental disorders, and thyroid disease.

Talking about backlash, the Wall Street Journal says, “We have a forest fire.”

In addition, here in Arkansas, Andy Anderson, Chairman of Ozark Mountain Regional Public Water Authority (OMRPWA) said, in explaining about his district:

“The Board made the decision NOT to mandate. The Board would not and WILL NOT comply with the water fluoridation mandate, and that is unanimous. Before the fluoridation mandate was proposed or made into law, many of our systems already had problematic naturally-occurring fluoride and other contaminants in their water, so we joined together to build OMRPWA to get uncontaminated water. Some customers said they would not pay their monthly water bills if we ever added industrial toxic waste fluoride. None of our systems serve 5,000 and would not have come under the fluoridation mandate. All 18 systems in the district were — and are — opposed to fluoridation.”

Arkansas’ Act 197  of 2011 mandated the forced fluoridation of all of Arkansas’ public water supplies servicing more than 5,000 people.

Water districts – let’s get behind the legislation to repeal Act 197 of 2011!

Among the many whistleblowers on the toxicity of fluoride and water fluoridation is highly qualified and experienced doctor Phyllis Mullenix, PhD. She is our main go-to person about this topic.

For many decades, Dr. Mullenix has been exposing alarming information about fluoride and the harm it can cause, and more states are beginning to listen, as noted in the bullet points at the beginning of this article.

You’ll see mentioned in the image below: Dr. P. Mullenix was Head of the world’s first Toxicology Department in a dental research institution UNTIL...
she published a paper that fluoride was neurotoxic.

So, what in the world happened?

Here is Dr. Mullenix’s bio:

DR. PHYLLIS J. MULLENIX, Ph.D. is a pharmacologist and toxicologist by training. She graduated from the Truman State University (Zoology — magna cum laude). Her Postdoctoral Training was as a Research Fellow, Environmental Medicine, The John Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore.

In the 1980s, Dr. Mullenix was Head of the Toxicology Department at the Forsyth Dental Center (now known as the Forsyth Institute), a world renowned dental research institution affiliated with the Harvard Medical School, where she led the investigation into the neurotoxicity of fluoride using sensitive computer pattern recognition systems. She was invited to start Forsyth’s Toxicology Department because of her expertise in neurotoxicology. In addition, she was a Research Associate in Psychiatry at the Children’s Hospital Medical Center in Boston.

For 20 years, while at the Harvard School of Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, and Forsyth Dental Infirmary for Children, her research focused on the development of screening procedures for neuro-behavioral disruption caused by perinatal exposure to drugs and environmental pollutants such as lead, radiation, and fluoride. She led the investigation into the neurotoxicity of fluoride using sensitive computer pattern recognition systems and has maintained a private consulting practice for over 30 years dealing with a variety of toxic exposures and related litigation.

The first test Dr. Mullenix was asked to perform at the Forsyth Dental Center was a test related to neurotoxicity of fluoride. The person who asked her to perform this test was Dr. Harold C. Hodge, one of the founders of the Society of Toxicology. 

Since that time, Dr. Mullenix has conducted additional research related to fluoride including one study which was published in Pub Med in 1995: Neurotoxicity of sodium fluoride in rats.

She was subsequently fired. (More on this in the interview linked below.)

Mullenix is considered to be the world’s foremost expert on the neurotoxicity of fluoride compounds.

Dr. Mullenix’s academic appointments, professional positions held, teaching experience, awards, honors, and many published scientific research articles to her name are numerous.

Because of her expertise, Dr. Mullenix is very busy publishing research, presenting at conferences, and meeting a large number of other obligations. But she has generously offered to discuss the issue of pre-natal and post-natal fluoride neurotoxicity and its relationship to ADD/ADHD and other neurological conditions.

As mentioned above, Mullenix was relieved of her position as Head of the Toxicology Department at Forsyth Dental Center. 

Very worthy to note is this:  What Dr. Mullenix presented at a seminar to the National Institute of Dental Research (NIDR) that, in reality, sounded the death knell of her career was that:

“The fluoride pattern of behavioral problems matches up with the same results of administering radiation and chemotherapy [to cancer patients]. All of these really nasty treatments that are used clinically in cancer therapy are well known to cause I.Q. deficits in children. That’s one of the best studied effects they know of. The behavioral pattern that results from the use of fluoride matches that produced by cancer treatment that causes a reduction in intelligence.”

Needless to say, they didn’t want to keep her on after she exposed the truth about fluoride. Then, not long after, apparently following her dismissal, the Forsyth Institute received a quarter-million dollar grant from the Colgate company.

Coincidence or reward? 

To learn more (including mention of the Manhattan Project), read the transcript of an interview of Dr. Phyllis Mullenix by Dr. Paul Connett that addresses Dr. Hodge, Dr. Hein, and the history here:

Fluoride & the Brain: An Interview with Dr. Phyllis Mullenix

Next, the image below shows a 2021 publication on “How the ADA Corrupted Science to put Fluoride into Standards of Care.”  The publication in a peer reviewed medical journal – Nutrients, 2021- How a Nutritional Deficiency Became Treated with Fluoride – points out that Hodge was key to promoting fluoridation (see page 10 of 16):

The second co-author, Hodge, was the ADA go-to-scientist on fluoride issues who submitted a letter to the US Senate Hearings in support of creating NIDR and who received an honorary ADA membership. The technical report was described in JADA as “the WHO … approving water fluoridation”.

JADA= Journal of the American Dental Association

WHO= World Health Organization

NIDR= National Institute of Dental Research

Standards of Care are benchmarks that determine whether professional obligations have been met for a patient.

So, for water fluoridation – and we are talking about industrial toxic waste fluoride – to be adopted into the Standards of Care was malicious.

No longer will we be deceived or misled by the propaganda put out by our government, *the National Institute of Dental Research (NIDR), the American Dental Association (ADA), the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), or the World Health Organization (WHO).

*The National Institute of Dental Research (NIDR), renamed the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR) in 1998, is a branch of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and was created in 1948 under President Harry Truman.

It was the NIDR’s so-called “research” that led to the development of adding toxic waste chemicals known as fluoride for community water fluoridation. 

How in the world can anyone believe that industrial toxic waste is beneficial for us, to the point that they would ADD it into our public water supplies?

Fluoride is NOT safe nor effective, and never has been... and yet, the CDC names community water fluoridation one of the 10 greatest health achievements in the 20th century. The CDC also funds and supports infrastructure in states to promote water fluoridation.

In closing, remember:  follow the money.

Stay tuned – we will be releasing more information about this and also what’s happening in Utah…

As always, our articles may be viewed on our website at  SecureArkansas.com. Once there, you may:

• view current articles on the main page;
• view older articles by clicking “Posts & Articles” at the top left of the main page and scrolling down.
• view additional past articles by clicking the “Next Page” button at the bottom right.

To find information about a topic, just type it into the Search box on our website, and click Enter!

Click here if you’d like to sign up to receive Secure Arkansas email alerts.

Securing the blessings of liberty,

Secure Arkansas
securetherepublic.com/arkansas
[email protected]

Disclaimer:

Legal Advice is Not Provided

The material in our emails/alerts and on our websites is only intended to provide general information and comment to the public. We make an effort to ensure that the information found in our emails/alerts and on our websites is accurate and timely, but we can’t and don’t guarantee that. Nor do we guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information contained on websites to which our websites or emails provide links.

Information found in our emails/alerts and on our websites should not be taken as legal advice. Legal matters can be complicated. For assistance with a specific legal problem or question, please contact a knowledgeable lawyer for assistance.